Sunday, December 19, 2010

Can you tell a baby boy from a baby girl?

I had just rolled up to a checkout line at the grocery store when the cashier began to coo over my baby.  We get that a lot.  She's awfully cute.  That day, she was sporting an especially adorable blue sweatshirt with a small ruffle around the neck, and the corduroy pull-ups from Baby Gap mentioned in a previous post.

The cashier was a big guy, I'm guessing upwards of 300 pounds, which made his effusiveness all the more fun.  "Who's mama's big boy?" he gushed.  "You certainly are a big strong baby boy, aren't you?"

"Oh...," I said, "um, thank you!"

Sometimes it just isn't worth it to me to correct people when they think my baby is a boy, not a girl.  I don't really care at all if they get it wrong, but when I do correct people, it seems to somehow upset them; they often wind up apologizing over and over, becoming especially vehement in their declarations of how pretty my baby is, etc. etc.  So this time, I didn't say anything.

But he went on and on.  And then 2 more people peered into the stroller and began making similar exclamations about what a big, healthy baby boy I had... .  At this point, I sort of wanted to correct them, but it had gone on so long that it was just not possible.  So I meekly paid and we made our exit.

And it got me thinking.  Is it even possible to tell a baby boy from a baby girl?  I mean, from the neck up, if they're not wearing any bows or baseball caps?



So, in true medical student style, I did a literature search!  And found...not much.  There's been only one study of sexual differences in children's faces.*

Heather Wild and colleagues at UT-Dallas performed an experiment** with both children and adults who were asked to categorize pictures of 7 to 10 year-old and 20 to 29 year-old faces as male or female.  Here's an example of what the pictures of adult faces looked like; the children's faces were presented in the same way, but no examples were published because of privacy concerns:



As you might expect, both children and adults were able to tell which adult faces were male and which were female (although adults were better at this than the kids were).  But what do you think?  Were children or adults able to tell which children's faces were male versus female?

The answer is yes, but much less accurately than for adult faces.  The A' value for adults judging the children's faces was around 0.75 (non-statisticians:  you can read A' as being roughly the same thing as 'percent correct', but the number's been adjusted a bit to account for the fact that participants tended to guess male more often than female), so adults got the gender right about 75% of the time for kids' faces, compared to about 100% of the time for adult faces.

I wish I could tell you about a similar experiment that was done with babies, rather than children.  But I can't, because no one's ever done it.  I'd be willing to bet that adults guessing babies' gender in a similar study would be right about, oh, 55% of the time.  But "it's an empirical question!," as my undergraduate research advisor used to love to say.  Someone should do the study.

Meantime, I can say that I think the super-gendered baby clothes that dominate stores are just silly.  It can be so difficult to find clothes that aren't blue or pink, especially for very young babies.  I've made an effort to get a variety of baby clothes; my daughter has some pink in her wardrobe, but I try to make sure that there's a sporty orange polo shirt for every polka-dotted sweater.

I think this is important because biased expectations of children start very, very early.  In the same issue of the same journal as the study described above, I stumbled across another experiment*** which asked mothers to estimate their 11-month-old son's or daughter's crawling skills and predict how their child would perform in a new crawling task up and down some sloped surfaces.

Interestingly, the mothers of baby girls significantly under-estimated their daughter's skills and future performance, while the mothers of baby boys significantly over-estimated their son's skills and future performance on the crawling task.  When the researchers actually measured the baby's skills and performance on a crawling task, there was absolutely no difference between the boys and girls.  The mothers were wrong; and not just wrong, but systematically wrong on the basis of their baby's gender.

So, if someone mistakes your baby for a boy rather than a girl, or vice versa?  Just shrug it off!  And keep those expectations high, regardless.

video
The offending gender-neutral sweatshirt that inspired this post!


*  That I could find.  Others with PubMed/Web of Science/Google Scholar savviness should see if they can dig anything else up.

**  Wild, H.A., Barrett, S.E., Spence, M.J., O'Toole, A.J., Cheng, Y.D., and Brooke,  J.  (2000).   Recognition and sex categorization of adults' and children's faces:  Examining performance in the absence of sex-stereotyped cues.  Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 269 - 291.

***  Mondschein, E.R., Adolph, K.E., and Tamis-LeMonda, C.S.  (2002).  Gender bias in mothers' expectations about infant crawling.   Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 304 - 316.

8 comments:

  1. This makes my geeky librarian heart soar...So proud that you were able to incorporate PubMed and APA citations into your blog! PsycINFO would be another resource to check. LM

    ReplyDelete
  2. Aw, glad you appreciated the APA-ness. I will definitely check PsycINFO, although I think that this really might be the only such study, since they mention in the study that they couldn't find any similar previous papers, and they haven't been cited by anyone since.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That crawling finding is so interesting! And I would agree that baby faces are difficult to gender-type. My brother always got pegged as a girl when he was a baby because he has long eyelashes. It's like people were basing this distinction on cartoons.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lauren--that crawling study is only the beginning--there's SO MUCH research showing that we treat even small infants quite differently on the basis of gender. It's fascinating.

    ReplyDelete
  5. LOL, I love Lauren's comment. My son has long eye-lashes, and people think they are a waste on a boy. Excuse me, but they are JUST as beautiful on him as they would be on a girl!

    Anyway, I do think some babies look more 'boyish' and some look more 'girlish' and many are definitely neutral-looking. Funny thing is, a girl can be one of the boyish looking babies and vice-versa. I think some moms dress their boyish-looking girls in frilly pink, hoping people will know it's a girl, lol. Why does it matter?

    ReplyDelete
  6. You know, I've occasionally tried to make my boyish-looking baby girl look a bit more girlish--and it is amazing how hard it is to change how people see her. I took her to my husband's office christmas party in a gray dress with a red sash and red and white tights...and people STILL asked how old my son was! I give up.

    ReplyDelete
  7. My sister was taking a human sexuality class where students did an experiment. She borrowed my son for it. You dress the baby up in gender-specific clothing, both for boy and then for girl. And a third, neutral outfit. You take them out and see what kinds of reactions adults give. For the gender-neutral outfit test, she wasn't supposed to answer if they asked "boy or girl?", just kind of avoid the question. Apparently it freaks people out to not know. I thought it was interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  8. We love our miracle babies! Here’s a $5 off coupon from My Miracle Baby.com to celebrate! $5 off your purchase of $30 or more. Use coupon code: SAVING05

    Baby Boy Clothes

    ReplyDelete